Defining Empirical Frames of Reference in Constitutional Cases: Unraveling the As-Applied Versus Facial Distinction in Constitutional Law

Authors

David L. Faigman, UC Hastings College of the LawFollow

Recommended Citation

David L. Faigman, Defining Empirical Frames of Reference in Constitutional Cases: Unraveling the As-Applied Versus Facial Distinction in Constitutional Law, 36 Hastings Const. L. Q. 631 (2009).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/faculty_scholarship/864

Publication Date

2009

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly