Indigenous peoples in major common law jurisdictions (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States) have had a fraught relationship with the state’s legal system. However, while denying Indigenous individuals and peoples the same rights as white settlers, each of these states used Indigenous art to create a distinctive national-state identity. We analyze four major exhibitions, one from each of these countries to de-naturalize legal institutions responsible for the oppression of Indigenous people. This agenda-setting, comparative legal analysis yields valuable insights for the regulation of the contemporary Indigenous art market, and to understand how culture makes legal personality.
Lucas Lixinski and Stephen Young,
Creative Differences: Indigenous Artists and the Law at 20th Century Nation-Building Exhibitions,
45 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 3
Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol45/iss1/3