Abstract
This note analyzes the complexities employer-sponsored egg freezing poses to female employees. The author highlights that with the high-cost procedure and low success rates, this enticing procedure should not be everyone's choice. Given the legal, social, and individual implications for female employees, the author notes that such employer-sponsored egg freezing is an implicit form of gender discrimination as employers push the female employees to work harder selling the sponsorship as a "benefit" of delaying having a family.
Recommended Citation
Ali L. Nicolette,
Empty Benefits: Employer-Sponsored Oocyte Cryopreservation and Potential for Employment Discrimination,
27 Hastings Women's L.J. 341
(2016).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hwlj/vol27/iss2/11
